'Disinformation' is a Bogus Concept

In recent years the concept of 'disinformation' has become widespread. 'Disinformation' refers to the deliberate dissemination of false or inaccurate information with the intention to mislead. It can be, and is, used to suppress the spread of true information. The spread of 'disinformation' has become a significant concern in the digital age, particularly with the rise of social media platforms. 'Disinformation' campaigns can manipulate public opinion, sow confusion, and undermine trust in reliable sources of information.

Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as 'disinformation'. There is only information, which may be true, partially true, or false (and this may change anytime). 'Disinformtion' refers to the use of information for a purpose other than informing someone of something factual. Thus 'disinformation' is a bogus concept because it is used not to inform but rather to deceive.

By manipulating algorithms that prioritize popularity over quality, 'disinformation' can be amplified and true information can be suppressed. Furthermore, 'disinformation' can be spread through social media platforms in the form of "fake news" or misleading articles that appear legitimate. This can make it difficult for readers to distinguish between true and false information, leading to the spread of false information and the suppression of true information.

The use of the word 'disinformation' is a technique to suppress the spread of true information, particularly through the manipulation of online platforms and the creation of echo chambers. Efforts to expose 'disinformation' and promote the spread of true information are crucial in maintaining an informed and engaged society.

It is worth remembering that 'disinformation' results from a deliberate intent to deceive. Don't be fooled.

Trygve E. Wighdal writes:
Misinformation: A laughable label slapped on anything that diverges from the "official" narrative, as if humans have never disagreed or been wrong before. It's essentially a fancy way to say, “Oops, you're mistaken -- but let’s make your thinking sound sinister and worthy of Gulag.”

Malinformation: A more absurd term, not even a word five minutes ago, implying that information can somehow be inherently “evil.” As if facts or opinions carry moral weight, rather than just being what they are -- neutral pieces of data. But, in their world truth is truly a dangerous notion.

Disinformation: The pinnacle of absurdity, suggesting deliberate deception, while conveniently ignoring that this could just be a matter of perspective. One man's "disinformation" is another man's truth, especially when the goalposts for truth keep shifting.

Even if these concoctions were accurate, the First Amendment protects all speech, whether mistaken, offensive, controversial, insulting or outright false, because the government cannot and should not be the arbiter of truth in a free society.

The function of information is to reduce or eliminate uncertainty, or to describe something that exists. To attempt to persuade somene of what is not true, or to influence their judgment or behavior for some purpose, as is done via 'disinformation' and 'misinformation', is a misuse of information or is something dressed up as information in order to deceive someone.

See also Trygve E. Wighdal's Regime Tyrants: Setting up a Coup?

Further reading: