Response to President Bush

31 May 2005

President Bush again failed to address longstanding concerns regarding US detention policies and practices in the context of the "war on terror", Amnesty International said in response to his comments today.

At Guantánamo, the US has operated an isolated prison camp in which people are confined arbitrarily, held virtually incommunicado, without charge, trial or access to due process. Not a single Guantánamo detainee has had the legality of their detention reviewed by a court, despite the Supreme Court ruling of last year.

"Guantánamo is only the visible part of the story. Evidence continues to mount that the US operates a network of detention centres where people are held in secret or outside any proper legal framework — from Afghanistan to Iraq and beyond," said Amnesty International.

US interrogation and detention policies and practices during the "war on terror", have deliberately and systematically breached the absolute prohibition of torture and Ill-treatment. Individuals held in US custody have been transferred for interrogation to countries known to practice torture.

"If President Bush and his administration are serious about freedom and human dignity they should recommit to the rule of law and human rights."

Amnesty International continues to call on the US administration to:

Background Information

When asked to comment about Amnesty International’s report during a White House Briefing President Bush said: "I'm aware of the Amnesty International report, and it's absurd. (...) The United States is a country that promotes freedom around the world. When there's accusations made about certain actions by our people, they're fully investigated in a transparent way."

For more information, please see:

"Guantánamo and beyond: The continuing pursuit of unchecked executive power":

"USA: Human dignity denied: Torture and accountability in the 'war on terror'":

This press release previously appeared
on the website of Amnesty International:

Letters to the Editor, L.A.Times, 2005-06-03:

So, the term "gulag" is a bit harsh to describe the conditions at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp (June 1). "It's absurd," President Bush says. OK then, let's be politically correct. Why not call it an "internment/torture facility." Will that help? Will that help you live in denial a bit longer? Wake up, people!

— Les M. Glasser, Fullerton

It is disturbing that our president and vice president are flippantly dismissing Amnesty International's allegations of torture and abuse at Guantanamo Bay. Amnesty International is an apolitical organization known and respected throughout the world. What would be its motivation for falsifying a report against the U.S.?

Since the organization is dedicated to ridding the world of torture, shouldn't its report be given serious consideration? Does anyone really believe that Amnesty International could be duped by liars as easily as the president is suggesting?

I can imagine any penny-ante thug/dictator in the world responding to Amnesty International's allegations against them in a way similar to Bush and Cheney, the supposed leaders of the free world. How far we have fallen.

Steven Lanzarotta, Culver City

The World Trade Center Demolition
and the So-Called War on Terrorism
Human Rights Serendipity Home Page